Generative AI Usage, Critical Thinking, and Learning Engagement: A Correlational Study of Undergraduate Students in Henan Regional Universities, China
Abstract
Purpose – Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly permeating university campuses, yet its relationships with critical thinking and learning engagement remain underexplored in China's regional universities. This study examined associations among undergraduates' GenAI usage behaviours, critical thinking dispositions, and learning engagement.
Method – A descriptive-correlational design was employed with 360 full-time undergraduates from three local universities in Henan Province. Validated instruments measured GenAI usage (frequency, context, purpose, method), five critical thinking dimensions, and three learning engagement dimensions. Pearson product–moment correlation analysis was used to examine the associations among the study variables.
Results – Students exhibited high-frequency but low-depth GenAI usage. Quality of engagement (context, purpose, method) was positively associated with analytical skill, systematic skill, inquisitiveness, and all learning engagement dimensions, but negatively correlated with truth-seeking and cognitive maturity. Usage frequency showed weak or non-significant associations.
Conclusion – How students engage with GenAI, rather than how often, is the critical factor influencing educational outcomes, with potential trade-offs in cognitive dispositions.
Recommendations – GenAI literacy could emphasise purposeful, critical use. Teachers are encouraged to design activities guiding reflective AI engagement. Institutions may consider developing clear guidelines for responsible integration.
Research Implications – The study contributes localised empirical evidence on the quality–outcome relationships of GenAI usage and offers a foundation for future research on intentional GenAI engagement in regional higher education.
Practical Implications – Universities should embed AI literacy in first-year curricula, using structured verification tasks; teachers should model critical AI use in assignments requiring synthesis rather than reproduction.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.





